Case Summary
**Case Summary: Nan Wilder v. Commissioner of Social Security**
**Docket Number:** 7837056
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., United States District Court for the [Specific District]]
**Date:** [Include Date of Decision]
**Overview:**
Nan Wilder filed a case against the Commissioner of Social Security challenging the denial of her application for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. The case focuses on allegations that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) failed to appropriately evaluate Wilder's medical impairments and the impact on her ability to work.
**Background:**
Nan Wilder, a [insert age] year-old female, applied for SSDI benefits on [insert application date], claiming she was unable to work due to [briefly describe medical conditions, e.g., chronic pain, mental health issues, etc.]. The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her application, leading Wilder to request a hearing before an ALJ.
During the hearing, Wilder presented evidence including medical records, personal testimony regarding her limitations, and assessments from treating physicians. Despite this, the ALJ ruled against her, stating that Wilder had the residual functional capacity to perform certain types of work.
**Issues:**
1. Did the ALJ properly assess Wilder's medical impairments and their impact on her ability to perform work-related activities?
2. Was there a failure to give adequate weight to the opinions of treating physicians?
3. Did the ALJ adequately consider Wilder's subjective complaints of pain and limitations?
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Wilder):** Argues that the ALJ’s findings were not supported by substantial evidence, as the ALJ disregarded critical medical opinions and failed to properly evaluate her subjective complaints.
- **Defendant (Commissioner of Social Security):** Contends that the ALJ followed the required legal standards and that the decision was supported by substantial evidence.
**Decision:**
[Insert a brief overview of the court’s decision, e.g., whether the court upheld the ALJ’s decision, reversed it, remanded the case for further proceedings, etc.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Nan Wilder v. Commissioner of Social Security highlights the challenges faced by individuals seeking disability benefits and the importance of thorough medical evaluations and the consideration of subjective complaints in the adjudication process. The decision may have implications for future cases regarding the evaluation of disability claims.
**Notes:**
- For further details and specifics about the ruling, refer to the court’s opinion and the administrative record.
- Include relevant citations or references to applicable statutes and regulations if necessary.
*[Note: Specific details like dates, specifics of the ruling, and context may need to be filled in based on the actual outcome and information from the case.]*