Legal Case Summary

Nathan Manuelito v. United States


Date Argued: Fri Jul 08 2016
Case Number: 15-16239
Docket Number: 4109274
Judges:Noonan, Nguyen, Anello
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Nathan Manuelito v. United States** **Docket Number:** 4109274 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., U.S. District Court] **Date:** [Specify the date if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Nathan Manuelito - **Defendant:** United States **Background:** Nathan Manuelito initiated legal proceedings against the United States, alleging [briefly summarize the nature of the claims against the defendant, e.g., violation of rights, negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The case arose from [provide context about the circumstances leading to the lawsuit, e.g., an incident, a policy, or an action taken by the government]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: Describe the first major legal question, e.g., whether the government had a duty to act in a certain way.] 2. [Issue 2: Describe the second major legal question, if applicable.] 3. [Additional issues as necessary.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Nathan Manuelito argued that [summarize the key points made by the plaintiff's counsel, including any evidence presented and legal precedents cited]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** The United States countered that [summarize the defense arguments, emphasizing any statutory or constitutional defenses invoked]. **Outcome:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [specify the party], deciding that [summarize the court’s reasoning and the final judgment issued, including any remedies or penalties imposed]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [explain the broader implications of the ruling, such as precedent-setting aspects, effects on future cases, or implications for public policy]. The ruling may also impact how similar cases will be handled in the future, particularly concerning [mention relevant areas of law]. **Conclusion:** The resolution of Nathan Manuelito v. United States serves as a critical point of reference in understanding the balance between governmental actions and individual rights within [specify relevant legal or societal context]. --- **Note:** Please replace placeholders and general statements with specific details relevant to the case as needed.

Nathan Manuelito v. United States


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available