Case Summary
### Case Summary: National Rural Electric Cooperative vs. Suzlon Wind
**Court:** [Court Name]
**Docket Number:** 2599880
**Date:** [Date of Decision]
#### Parties Involved:
- **Plaintiff:** National Rural Electric Cooperative (NRECA)
- **Defendant:** Suzlon Wind Energy Corporation
#### Background:
The case involves a dispute between NRECA, an organization that represents the interests of rural electric cooperatives, and Suzlon, a company specializing in the manufacturing of wind turbine technology. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to fulfill contractual obligations that were essential for the development and implementation of a wind energy project.
#### Facts:
- NRECA entered into a contract with Suzlon for the supply and installation of wind turbines for a renewable energy project aimed at enhancing sustainable energy sources in rural areas.
- The project faced significant delays and increased costs, which NRECA claimed were caused by Suzlon’s failure to meet delivery timelines and performance benchmarks as outlined in the contract.
- NRECA sought damages for losses incurred due to operational disruptions and additional expenses arising from Suzlon's alleged breach of contract.
#### Legal Issues:
The main issues at stake included:
1. Whether Suzlon breached the contractual agreement with NRECA.
2. The extent of damages that NRECA suffered as a result of the alleged breach.
3. Any defenses or counterclaims raised by Suzlon regarding the delays and performance issues.
#### Proceedings:
- The case was brought to [Court Name] where both parties presented their evidence and arguments.
- NRECA showcased documentation proving the delays and communicated concerns with Suzlon during the project timeline.
- Suzlon, on the other hand, argued that external factors, including supply chain issues and regulatory changes, contributed to the delays, asserting that they fulfilled their contractual obligations to the best of their ability under the circumstances.
#### Ruling:
The court ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant] based on the evidence presented. The decision included:
- Affirmation that [Suzlon/NRECA] was found liable for [breach of contract/no breach].
- Awarding of damages amounting to [specific amount] to [NRECA/Suzlon] for losses incurred.
#### Impact:
This case emphasizes the importance of clear contractual obligations and the need for communication between partners in renewable energy projects. It also highlights the challenges faced in the wind energy sector, including external factors that can impact project timelines and costs.
#### Conclusion:
The ruling in National Rural Electric Cooperative vs. Suzlon Wind may set a precedent for future disputes in the renewable energy sector, especially concerning the responsibilities of suppliers and the expectations of project developers.
---
**Note:** The details provided here are illustrative and should be adapted based on the actual case details, court findings, and legal analysis presented in the actual case.