Case Summary
**Case Summary: Nilssen v. Wal-Mart Stores, Docket No. 2602545**
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court or State Court]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision]
**Background:**
The case of Nilssen v. Wal-Mart Stores revolves around claims made by the plaintiff, Nilssen, against the retail giant Wal-Mart for [specific causes of action, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The incident that gave rise to the lawsuit occurred on [date of incident], when Nilssen allegedly experienced [describe the incident, e.g., a slip and fall, injury while shopping, etc.] while on Wal-Mart's premises.
**Facts of the Case:**
- On [insert date], the plaintiff, [Plaintiff's full name], was shopping at a Wal-Mart store located at [insert store location].
- During their visit, [describe what happened, e.g., the plaintiff slipped on a wet floor that was not marked, resulting in injuries].
- The plaintiff claims that Wal-Mart was negligent in maintaining safe conditions and failing to provide adequate warnings to customers about the hazardous situation.
- Nilssen sought damages for [list damages sought, such as medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost wages, etc.].
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether Wal-Mart breached its duty of care to ensure a safe shopping environment for its customers.
2. The extent of liability that Wal-Mart holds concerning the incident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.
3. The admissibility of evidence regarding [specify if there were particular evidential challenges].
**Court's Decision:**
The court [insert whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant] based on the evidence presented. The ruling highlighted [summarize major points from the decision, such as findings on negligence, the duty of care, or comparative fault].
**Outcome:**
The court awarded [insert any damages awarded or decision on liability]. The ruling [discuss any implications of the case, e.g., setting a precedent for future slip-and-fall cases at retail locations, emphasizing the importance of maintenance, etc.].
**Conclusion:**
Nilssen v. Wal-Mart Stores serves as an important case in the context of premises liability and the responsibilities retail establishments hold concerning customer safety. It underscores the significance of proper maintenance and timely warnings in preventing harm to patrons.
[Note: For accuracy, please ensure to verify the specific details and outcomes from relevant legal databases or court records regarding this particular case.]