Legal Case Summary

ORENSHTEYN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS


Date Argued: Thu Apr 04 2013
Case Number: 31639-4
Docket Number: 2605282
Judges:Not available
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems, Docket Number 2605282** **Court:** [Applicable Court Information] **Date:** [Date of Decision] **Judge:** [Judge's Name] **Parties Involved:** - Plaintiff: Oren Orenshteyn - Defendant: Citrix Systems, Inc. **Background:** Orenshteyn filed suit against Citrix Systems, Inc., alleging [insert specific claims made by the plaintiff, such as breach of contract, employment discrimination, unjust termination, etc.]. The dispute arose from [briefly outline the circumstances and specifics of the dispute, such as the job role of Orenshteyn, the context of the employment, and key events leading to the lawsuit]. **Issues:** The core issues to be resolved in this case included: 1. [First issue, e.g., whether Citrix Systems breached a specific term in the employment contract] 2. [Second issue, e.g., whether the actions of Citrix constituted discrimination or retaliation] 3. [Any additional legal issues relevant to the case] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Orenshteyn contended that [summarize the plaintiff's arguments, including evidence presented and the legal basis for their claims]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Citrix Systems countered that [summarize the defendant's defenses, including their evidence and legal interpretations]. **Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant] based on [summarize the court’s reasoning and the relevant laws or precedents cited in the decision]. Specifically, the court found that [key findings of facts and legal conclusions]. **Outcome:** The ruling resulted in [detail the consequences of the court's decision, such as damages awarded, reinstatement orders, or any other remedies mandated]. **Significance:** This case highlights [discuss the broader implications of the case for employment law, corporate practices, or other relevant aspects]. The decision reinforces [mention any legal precedents, interpretations of the law, or impactful legal principles established by the case]. **Conclusion:** Orenshteyn v. Citrix Systems serves as an important example of [concisely recap the case's importance in the context of related legal issues or societal impacts]. The case continues to be referenced in discussions related to [relevant legal standards or corporate conduct issues].

ORENSHTEYN v. CITRIX SYSTEMS


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available