Legal Case Summary

Oscar Brownfield v. City of Yakima


Date Argued: Thu Apr 08 2010
Case Number: 09-35628
Docket Number: 7847823
Judges:Lucero, Hawkins, Smith N. R.
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Oscar Brownfield v. City of Yakima** **Docket Number:** 7847823 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Oscar Brownfield - **Defendant:** City of Yakima **Background:** Oscar Brownfield filed a lawsuit against the City of Yakima alleging various claims related to [insert specific issues or claims, e.g., negligence, wrongful termination, discrimination, etc.]. The case revolves around [provide a brief overview of the circumstances leading to the lawsuit, including relevant facts and events that transpired]. **Claims:** Brownfield's claims include: - [Claim 1: e.g., violation of civil rights] - [Claim 2: e.g., negligence or failure to provide services] - [Claim 3: e.g., breach of contract, if applicable] **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in the case involve: - [Issue 1: e.g., whether the City has immunity under specific statutes] - [Issue 2: e.g., whether the actions taken by city officials were justified] - [Additional relevant legal issues] **Court's Analysis:** The court analyzed the evidence presented by both parties, including [list types of evidence, such as witness testimonies, documents, etc.]. It evaluated the legal standards applicable to the claims made by Brownfield and assessed the defenses raised by the City of Yakima. **Outcome:** The court rendered its decision on [insert date of decision], ruling in favor of [plaintiff/defendant] based on [summarize the reasoning behind the court’s decision, including any key legal principles applied]. The ruling included [mention any remedies, compensation, or changes ordered, if applicable]. **Conclusion:** The case of Oscar Brownfield v. City of Yakima highlights important [issues, statutes, or social concerns related to the claims in the case]. The decision emphasizes [summarize any key takeaways or implications of the verdict]. **Next Steps:** [Include information about any potential appeals, further legal actions, or any follow-up hearings if applicable.] --- Please fill in the sections that require more specific information, as actual facts of the case were not provided.

Oscar Brownfield v. City of Yakima


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available