Legal Case Summary

Owner-Operator Ind. Drivers v. Richard Corey


Date Argued: Wed Apr 19 2017
Case Number: 15-16429
Docket Number: 4845968
Judges:Reinhardt, Tashima, Molloy
Duration: 21 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Owner-Operator Independent Drivers v. Richard Corey** **Docket Number: 4845968** **Court**: [Insert Court Name] **Date**: [Insert Date of Filing or Ruling] **Parties Involved**: - **Plaintiff**: Owner-Operator Independent Drivers (OOIDA) - **Defendant**: Richard Corey **Background**: The case of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers v. Richard Corey revolves around a dispute involving independent truck drivers represented by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) and Richard Corey, the relevant defendant (insert description of the defendant's role or business, if available). The specifics of the case are centered on [insert the relevant matter, such as contract disputes, employment classification, regulatory compliance, or other relevant legal issues]. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. Whether Richard Corey [insert specific actions taken by the defendant that led to the dispute – such as breach of contract, unfair business practices, etc.]. 2. The interpretation of laws governing independent contractor status for truck drivers. 3. [Any other pertinent legal issue related to the case]. **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff's Arguments**: The plaintiff (OOIDA) argues that [summarize the main arguments of the plaintiff, including any legal principles they are relying on and the relief sought]. - **Defendant's Arguments**: The defendant, Richard Corey, counters that [summarize the defendant's arguments, including any defenses raised and rationale against the claims]. **Court's Analysis**: The court's analysis focused on [summarize the court's reasoning, which may involve examination of state and federal laws governing trucking, employment classifications, and relevant case law]. The court considered [insert any evidentiary issues or testimonies that were central to the case]. **Outcome**: The court ruled in favor of [insert party name], [briefly state the decision made by the court, including any orders for monetary damages, injunctions, or other forms of relief granted]. **Significance**: This case is significant as it addresses [insert potential implications for the trucking industry, independent contractors, regulatory issues, or other relevant aspects]. It serves as a precedent for similar cases involving independent drivers and defines [insert any legal principles or changes resulting from the case]. **Conclusion**: The ruling in Owner-Operator Independent Drivers v. Richard Corey is a pivotal case that highlights the complexities of the trucking industry's regulatory framework and the ongoing challenges faced by independent operators in asserting their rights. **[Note: Insert any additional relevant information or context as necessary.]**

Owner-Operator Ind. Drivers v. Richard Corey


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available