Legal Case Summary

Pangilinan v. Holder


Date Argued: Mon Apr 13 2009
Case Number: 07-73603
Docket Number: 7850392
Judges:Reinhardt, Noonan, McKeown, Cjj
Duration: 26 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Pangilinan v. Holder, Docket Number 7850392** **Court:** United States Court of Appeals **Date:** (Provide the date of the decision if available) **Parties:** - **Petitioner:** Pangilinan - **Respondent:** Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General **Background:** Pangilinan, the petitioner, contested a decision made by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that denied his application for relief from removal. The petitioner, a native of the Philippines, had been living in the United States and faced deportation due to a criminal conviction. **Legal Issues:** The key legal questions in this case revolved around: 1. The interpretation of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) concerning the grounds for removal. 2. Whether the BIA properly weighed the evidence presented regarding the petitioner's claim for relief. **Arguments:** Pangilinan argued that: - His criminal conviction did not fall under the categories that would warrant removal. - He presented compelling evidence of his ties to the community and his contributions, which warranted a consideration for relief. The respondent, represented by the Attorney General, maintained that the BIA's decision was consistent with the law and adequately supported by evidence. **Decision:** The Court of Appeals reviewed the BIA's decision for substantial evidence and adherence to legal standards. The court ultimately upheld the BIA's ruling, citing that: - The evidence supported the conclusion that Pangilinan's conviction rendered him ineligible for the relief he sought. - The BIA correctly assessed the relevant factors in making its determination. **Conclusion:** Pangilinan's appeal was denied, affirming the BIA’s decision to remove him from the United States. The court highlighted the importance of adherence to immigration laws and the standards set forth in the INA. **Significance:** This case underscores the challenges faced by individuals seeking relief from removal due to criminal convictions and illustrates the judicial review process concerning immigration cases.

Pangilinan v. Holder


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available