Legal Case Summary

Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates,LLC.


Date Argued: Thu Mar 30 2017
Case Number: 16-3852
Docket Number: 4658988
Judges:Not available
Duration: 40 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC **Docket Number:** 4658988 **Court:** [Insert appropriate court name] **Date:** [Insert date of decision if available] #### Parties Involved: - **Plaintiff:** [Plaintiff's Full Name], represented by [Plaintiff's Attorney's Name, if available] - **Defendant:** Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, represented by [Defendant's Attorney's Name, if available] #### Background: This case involves [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, such as a debt collection issue, especially if it relates to alleged violations of consumer protection laws]. The plaintiff, [Plaintiff's Name], filed a lawsuit against the defendant, Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, alleging [insert the key claims made by the plaintiff, such as violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), wrongful collections, inaccuracies in reporting, etc.]. #### Legal Issues: The main legal issues in this case include: 1. [List out key legal issues, such as violations of FDCPA, state law claims, etc.] 2. [Additional issues, such as whether the debt was verified, proper notification, etc.] #### Proceedings: The case was brought before the court on [insert relevant dates regarding motions filed, hearings, etc.]. Both parties presented their arguments, with the plaintiff asserting that [briefly describe the plaintiff's arguments] and the defendant responding with [summarize the defendant's arguments or defenses]. #### Court Decision: After reviewing the evidence and arguments presented, the court [insert the decision of the court, whether it was in favor of the plaintiff, defendant, or if a settlement was reached]. The court ruled that [summarize the key points of the ruling, including any findings on the legality of the actions taken by Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, and any damages awarded to the plaintiff]. #### Implications: The case highlights important considerations in debt collection practices and consumer rights, particularly regarding [mention any relevant consumer protection laws impacted by the ruling]. The resolution of this case may influence future debt collection practices and reinforce consumers' rights against unfair collection methods. #### Conclusion: Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC serves as a critical reminder of the complexities involved in debt collection and consumer protection laws, emphasizing the importance of both compliance by collection agencies and the rights of consumers to challenge unlawful practices. --- *Note: Please ensure to insert specific details where placeholders are mentioned, as the information provided is generic and illustrative. Specific dates, legal arguments, outcomes, and implications relevant to the actual case should be elaborated upon based on factual details from the court records.*

Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates,LLC.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available