Legal Case Summary

PARK v. ANAHEIM UNION H.S. DISTRICT


Date Argued: Wed Dec 07 2005
Case Number: 04-55569
Docket Number: 7857132
Judges:Beezer, Hall, Wardlaw
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Park v. Anaheim Union High School District** **Docket Number:** 7857132 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** [Plaintiff Name], a student/parent (or relevant party) - **Defendant:** Anaheim Union High School District **Background:** The case involves disputes arising from actions taken by the Anaheim Union High School District regarding [briefly state the issue, e.g., disciplinary action against the student, denial of special education accommodations, etc.]. The plaintiff, [Plaintiff Name], contended that the actions taken by the district violated their rights [or specific laws, regulations, or guidelines]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in the case included: 1. [Issue 1 - e.g., whether the district complied with state and federal education laws] 2. [Issue 2 - e.g., potential discrimination claims] 3. [Issue 3 - e.g., due process considerations] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** The plaintiff asserted that the Anaheim Union High School District failed to adhere to [relevant laws or policies], which resulted in [discriminatory practices, inadequate educational transfer, etc.]. The plaintiff sought [specific remedies, e.g., reinstatement, compensatory damages, etc.]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** The district maintained that their actions were justified and in compliance with applicable guidelines. They argued that [insert any relevant defenses the district might have provided]. **Court's Analysis:** In its analysis, the court evaluated the evidence presented by both parties, considering [mention any relevant statutes, precedents or guidelines]. The court found that [summarize the key findings or conclusions made by the court]. The court also discussed [any relevant notice or due process issues, if applicable]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant], stating that [briefly summarize the court's decision and any orders, remedies, or actions the court directed]. **Conclusion:** The case underscores the importance of ensuring compliance with [relevant educational laws or practices] within school districts and highlights the rights of students and parents in the educational system. **Note:** This summary provides a general overview of the case and is not exhaustive of all details or legal arguments presented during the proceedings. Further research may be required for a comprehensive understanding of the case and its implications.

PARK v. ANAHEIM UNION H.S. DISTRICT


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available