Legal Case Summary

PATEL v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO


Date Argued: Thu Oct 19 2006
Case Number: 04-56839
Docket Number: 7855769
Judges:Pregerson, Gould, Clifton
Duration: 40 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Patel v. City of San Bernardino** **Docket Number:** 7855769 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Patel (Individual/Business Name) - **Defendant:** City of San Bernardino **Background:** In the case of Patel v. City of San Bernardino, the plaintiff, Patel, brought suit against the City of San Bernardino concerning [insert relevant issue, e.g., a zoning dispute, an alleged violation of civil rights, regulatory issues, etc.]. The dispute arises from [briefly describe the events leading to the case, such as specific actions taken by the city, or the impact on Patel]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues under consideration include: 1. [Insert legal issue 1, e.g., Did the City of San Bernardino violate Patel's rights under a specific law?] 2. [Insert legal issue 2, e.g., Was the city's action justified based on local regulations?] 3. [Insert any additional legal issues that are relevant.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** - Patel contends that [summarize the plaintiff's main arguments, such as specific laws allegedly violated, evidence presented, and the relief sought]. - [Include any key legal precedents or statutes cited by Patel]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** - The City of San Bernardino argues that [summarize the city’s defense, including any justifications for its actions and relevant legal defenses]. - [Include any legal precedents, statutes, or regulations cited by the city]. **Judgment:** [Insert any available information regarding the court's ruling, including if the case was decided in favor of Patel or the City of San Bernardino, and any specific orders or injunctions issued by the court.] **Conclusion:** The case of Patel v. City of San Bernardino highlights important legal questions regarding [summarize the broader significance of the case, such as the interaction between individual rights and municipal regulations]. The outcome of the case may set a precedent for similar disputes in the future. **Note:** [Include any information on potential appeals, ongoing proceedings, or implications for local law or governance if applicable.] *Please verify dates and specific details as the context of the case may vary.*

PATEL v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available