Case Summary
**Case Summary: Patricia Arellano v. Clark County Collection Service**
**Docket Number:** 6069682
**Court:** [Specify jurisdiction or court name]
**Date of Ruling:** [Specify ruling date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Patricia Arellano
- **Defendant:** Clark County Collection Service
**Background:**
Patricia Arellano filed a lawsuit against Clark County Collection Service, alleging unlawful debt collection practices. The case arose from an issue related to alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and possibly other related statutes. Arellano claimed that the collection service engaged in practices that were deceptive and harassing in nature.
**Claims:**
Arellano asserted that Clark County Collection Service:
1. Engaged in misleading communications regarding her debt.
2. Failed to provide proper validation of the debt upon request.
3. Employed harassing tactics to collect the debt, including excessive phone calls and threatening language.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case revolved around:
- Whether the actions of Clark County Collection Service were in violation of the FDCPA.
- The extent to which Arellano's rights under the FDCPA were infringed upon by the defendant's collection methods.
- Possible emotional distress and damages caused by the alleged misconduct.
**Court Decision:**
The court ultimately ruled in favor of [plaintiff or defendant], finding that [include key findings or judgments]. The court may have addressed the validity of the debt, the legitimacy of the collection practices, and assessments of any damages or penalties owed.
**Outcome:**
[Summarize the outcome of the case, such as whether Arellano was awarded damages, the amount awarded, any injunctions placed on Clark County Collection Service, etc.]
**Significance:**
This case serves as a vital reminder of the protections afforded to consumers under the FDCPA and reinforces the legal boundaries within which debt collectors must operate. It underscores the importance of proper debt validation and ethical collection practices.
**Conclusion:**
The Arellano v. Clark County Collection Service case highlights ongoing issues in consumer protection law and the necessity for debt collectors to adhere strictly to legal standards to ensure fair treatment of individuals facing financial hardship.
---
Please fill in the specific court details and date of ruling, as well as provide the outcome based on the actual case information if available.