Legal Case Summary

Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water


Date Argued: Thu Jun 07 2018
Case Number: 16-35884
Docket Number: 7090131
Judges:Graber, M. Smith, Hellerstein
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water** **Docket Number:** 7090131 **Court:** [Specify the Court or Jurisdiction] **Date:** [Specify Date of Issuance] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Patricia Holloway - **Defendant:** Clackamas River Water **Facts of the Case:** Patricia Holloway filed a lawsuit against Clackamas River Water alleging [briefly state the cause of action, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that [provide a brief overview of the facts leading to the lawsuit, including any relevant incidents, dates, or actions taken by both parties]. Holloway contends that [state the key grievances or injuries suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's actions]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around [list the main legal questions or issues that the court needs to resolve, such as liability, damages, compliance with regulations, etc.]. The court will need to determine whether Clackamas River Water [indicate the specific allegations against the water authority, such as negligence or breach of duty] and whether Holloway suffered any damages as a result. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Patricia Holloway asserts that [summarize the plaintiff's arguments, including references to laws, regulations, or evidence supporting her claims]. She argues that [highlight any significant points made by the plaintiff's side]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Clackamas River Water contends that [summarize the defendant's response, including any defenses raised and evidence presented]. The defendant may argue that [include key points from the defense]. **Court's Analysis:** In analyzing the case, the court will consider [discuss the framework or standard the court uses to evaluate the claims, including any relevant legal precedents, statutes, or regulations]. The court may address [mention any factual determinations, issues of law, or evidence that are particularly important to the decision]. **Decision:** The court ultimately [describe the outcome of the case, whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant, and any specific orders or judgments rendered]. **Implications:** This case highlights [discuss the broader implications of the decision, such as potential impacts on similar cases, public policy considerations, or precedents set by the ruling]. **Conclusion:** The case of Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water underscores the importance of [summarize the key takeaway from the case, relating to the issues at hand]. The court's ruling [issue a final thought on how the case may influence future legal considerations or practices in similar contexts]. --- (Note: Specific details like the court, date, and relevant legal points should be filled in with actual information from the case file or judgment as necessary.)

Patricia Holloway v. Clackamas River Water


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available