Legal Case Summary

Patricia Samson v. Wells Fargo Bank


Date Argued: Mon Dec 03 2018
Case Number: 17-55927
Docket Number: 8345061
Judges:Tashima, Ikuta, Kennelly
Duration: 21 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Patricia Samson v. Wells Fargo Bank** **Docket Number:** 8345061 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., United States District Court/State Court] **Date:** [Specify Date of the Decision or Filing] **Jurisdiction:** [Specify Jurisdiction] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Patricia Samson - **Defendant:** Wells Fargo Bank **Case Overview:** Patricia Samson filed a lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging [specific claims, e.g., wrongful foreclosure, discrimination, breach of contract, etc.]. The case centers on [briefly describe the key facts leading to the lawsuit, e.g., a banking transaction dispute, alleged financial misconduct, or service issues]. **Facts:** - Patricia Samson claims that [detail the specific actions or inactions of Wells Fargo that led to the dispute]. - The plaintiff alleges that Wells Fargo [describe the harm suffered by the plaintiff, such as financial loss, emotional distress, etc.]. - [Include any relevant timeline of events, including key actions taken by both sides]. **Legal Issues:** The principal legal issues in this case include: 1. [Issue 1 - e.g., whether Wells Fargo violated any state or federal banking laws]. 2. [Issue 2 - e.g., whether the plaintiff's claims are barred by any statutes of limitations]. 3. [Additional legal issues that are pertinent to the case]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** - Samson contends that [summarize the plaintiff's arguments, emphasizing any legal precedents or laws invoked]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** - Wells Fargo counters that [summarize the defendant's defense strategy, including any motions filed to dismiss or other legal arguments]. **Outcome:** [Describe the outcome of the case, including whether it was dismissed, settled, or if a ruling was made by the judge. If applicable, mention any awarded damages, legal costs, or injunctions imposed.] **Significance:** This case is significant because [provide insights into the implications of the case for the banking industry, potential changes to policy, or legal precedents that may affect future cases]. **Conclusion:** The ruling in Patricia Samson v. Wells Fargo Bank highlights [summarize the broader implications or lessons from the case, and how it may influence legal standards or banking practices]. --- **Note:** This summary is a hypothetical reconstruction based on general legal practices. For accurate details regarding the case, please consult official court documents or legal databases.

Patricia Samson v. Wells Fargo Bank


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available