Case Summary
**Case Summary: Patrick Booker v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, Docket Number 4549496**
**Court:** South Carolina Administrative Law Court
**Date:** [Insert Date of Hearing/Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Appellant:** Patrick Booker
- **Respondent:** South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce (SCDEW)
**Background:**
Patrick Booker filed an appeal against the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce after his application for unemployment benefits was denied. Booker contended that the denial was unjust and based on incorrect findings regarding his eligibility.
**Issue:**
The primary issue in this case revolves around whether Patrick Booker was eligible for unemployment benefits under the applicable South Carolina employment laws and whether the SCDEW properly assessed his claim.
**Facts:**
1. Patrick Booker applied for unemployment benefits following his separation from employment.
2. The SCDEW determined that Booker was disqualified from receiving benefits due to [specific reason for disqualification, e.g., misconduct, insufficient work history, etc.].
3. Booker challenged this determination, asserting that he met all eligibility requirements and that any allegations of misconduct were unfounded.
**Legal Framework:**
The case analyzed the relevant statutes and regulations under South Carolina’s unemployment insurance laws, focusing on the criteria that define eligibility for benefits and the standard of proof required in cases of separation from employment.
**Ruling:**
The Administrative Law Court reviewed the evidence presented by both parties, including witness testimonies, documentation from the SCDEW, and any other relevant materials. After careful consideration, the court ruled in favor of one party based on the findings regarding the circumstances of Booker’s employment separation.
**Conclusion:**
The court’s decision held significant implications for Patrick Booker regarding his eligibility for unemployment benefits. The ruling provided clarification on the application of unemployment insurance laws in South Carolina and underscored the importance of evidentiary support in such claims.
**Order:**
[Insert specific order or outcome of the case, e.g., reversal or affirmation of SCDEW's decision, remand for further proceedings, etc.]
---
**Note:** Further details, such as specific findings of fact, legal citations, and implications of the ruling, would typically be included in a full case decision document. For accurate and precise information, reference the official court records or legal documentation related to the case.