Case Summary
**Case Summary: Paul Devoe, III v. Lorie Davis, Director, Docket No. 6126513**
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Court Decision, if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Appellant:** Paul Devoe, III
- **Appellee:** Lorie Davis, Director
**Background:**
This case involves Paul Devoe, III appealing a decision made by Lorie Davis, the Director of the facility/agency in question. The nature of the appeal pertains to certain actions, decisions, or policies implemented during Devoe's time in custody. While the specific details surrounding the issues of appeal are not outlined, it is likely that the appeal addresses questions of due process, rights while incarcerated, or challenges to institutional policies.
**Legal Issues:**
Devoe contends that the decisions made by the Director, which are not fully specified here, have violated his rights or have been in contravention of established laws or regulations governing the treatment of individuals within the custody of the state.
**Arguments:**
- **For Appellant (Devoe):** Devoe argues that the Director’s actions have negatively impacted his rights in significant ways. His appeal seeks redress for perceived wrongs.
- **For Appellee (Davis):** The Director likely argues that the policies and actions taken were lawful, appropriate, and necessary for the management of the facility and the safety of all individuals involved.
**Ruling:**
The outcome of the case (whether in favor of Devoe or Davis) would provide clarification on the extent of the Director's authority and discretion in managing inmates. The ruling would also address the legal standards applicable to such cases and help establish precedents regarding inmate rights and administrative procedure.
**Conclusion:**
The decision in the case of Paul Devoe, III v. Lorie Davis is significant to the broader discourse surrounding correctional policy and inmate rights, potentially impacting future cases within the jurisdiction concerning similar issues.
**Note:** Specific details about the case’s arguments, legal principles involved, and the ruling would ideally be based on the actual case documents or court opinions. Thus, further research may be necessary to extract precise information related to the case at hand.