Legal Case Summary

Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA


Date Argued: Tue May 13 2014
Case Number: D-14-0002
Docket Number: 2591192
Judges:Paul V. Niemeyer, Roger L. Gregory, Henry F. Floyd
Duration: 42 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA** **Docket Number:** 2591192 **Court:** [Specify Court/State, if known] **Filing Date:** [Specify Date, if known] **Case Type:** [Specify Type, e.g., Civil, Contract, etc.] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Paul Sartin - **Defendant:** McNair Law Firm PA **Background:** Paul Sartin, the plaintiff, initiated legal action against the McNair Law Firm PA, alleging [briefly outline the reason for the lawsuit, such as breach of contract, negligence, or other claims]. The dispute arose from [provide a brief background of the events leading to the case, including any relevant facts or interactions between the parties]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in this case include: 1. [First Legal Issue - e.g., whether the law firm breached its duty to the client] 2. [Second Legal Issue - e.g., determination of damages resulting from the alleged breach] 3. [Any other relevant legal issues] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff (Paul Sartin):** Sartin's argument rests on the claim that McNair Law Firm PA failed to fulfill its obligations, resulting in [describe any specific damages, loss, or consequences Sartin faced]. He contends that [highlight key points of Sartin's legal arguments or claims]. - **Defendant (McNair Law Firm PA):** The law firm argues that [briefly outline the firm's defense, such as asserting proper procedures were followed, any claims of negligence or wrongfulness, or justification for their actions]. They may also claim [any counterarguments or motions for dismissal, if applicable]. **Procedural Posture:** As of the latest filings, the case is [describe the status, e.g., pending trial, awaiting a motion to dismiss, etc.]. Both parties have submitted [mention any motions, evidence, or relevant documents that have been filed with the court]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of this case is significant due to [mention any broader implications, such as legal precedents, impact on the law firm’s reputation, or the legal rights of clients]. The court’s decision will likely address essential questions surrounding [list any broad legal principles or rights at stake]. --- **Note:** This case summary serves as a general outline and captures the essence of the dispute without extensive legal jargon. Specific details regarding dates, court specifications, and precise legal claims would need to be filled in based on available court records and filings. If additional or updated information is desired, please consult legal databases or court records directly.

Paul Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available