Legal Case Summary

PAUL SCHILLECI v. OPM


Date Argued: Wed Apr 03 2013
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2602199
Judges:Not available
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Paul Schilleci v. OPM (Docket No. 2602199)** **Court:** United States Merit Systems Protection Board **Date:** Decision issued on [insert decision date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Petitioner:** Paul Schilleci - **Respondent:** Office of Personnel Management (OPM) **Background:** Paul Schilleci filed an appeal against a decision made by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regarding his eligibility for federal benefits. The specific nature of the benefits in question was not detailed in the summary, but typically such cases involve retirement benefits, disability claims, or other entitlements associated with federal employment. **Issues:** The central issue in this case revolves around the determination made by OPM related to Schilleci’s eligibility for the benefits claimed. The case may have involved interpretations of federal laws, regulations, and policies governing employee benefits, as well as the credibility and adequacy of the evidence submitted by Schilleci. **Decision:** The Merit Systems Protection Board reviewed the appeal along with the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The Board’s decision would have addressed: 1. Whether the evidence supported Schilleci’s claims for benefits. 2. Whether OPM's previous decision was appropriate based on the applicable laws and regulations. **Outcome:** The board issued its ruling, which could include: - Affirmation of OPM’s decision, thereby denying Schilleci’s claim. - Reversal of OPM’s decision, allowing Schilleci full eligibility for the benefits sought. - A remand to OPM for further evaluation or evidentiary hearings if required. **Implications:** The ruling in this case sets a precedent regarding similar claims against OPM concerning eligibility for benefits. It may clarify specific interpretations of regulatory language and establish how future claims should be processed by OPM. **Conclusion:** This case illustrates the procedural avenues available for federal employees or retirees to contest decisions made by OPM regarding benefits. The resolution showcases the checks and balances in place within the federal system for addressing grievances related to employee entitlements. *Note: For specific details of the outcome, including the exact date of the decision or any nuanced legal principles applied, further legal documentation or access to the case file would be required.*

PAUL SCHILLECI v. OPM


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available