Legal Case Summary

Paula Ramsum v. Walter Frenzel


Date Argued: Mon Jun 01 2015
Case Number: W2014-01221-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2661116
Judges:O'scannlain, Tashima, McKeown
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Paula Ramsum v. Walter Frenzel, Docket Number 2661116** **Court:** [Specify Court] **Date Filed:** [Specify Date] **Jurisdiction:** [Specify Jurisdiction] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Paula Ramsum - **Defendant:** Walter Frenzel **Background:** The case of Paula Ramsum v. Walter Frenzel revolves around a dispute between the plaintiff, Paula Ramsum, and the defendant, Walter Frenzel. The nature of the conflict involves [briefly explain the subject of the case, e.g., a contract dispute, personal injury claim, property issue, etc.]. The plaintiff alleges that [summarize the plaintiff's claims, legal grounds for the lawsuit, and any pertinent details about the incident or dispute that led to the case]. The defendant, Walter Frenzel, contests these allegations, asserting that [summarize the defense's arguments and stance on the matter]. **Key Issues:** 1. [Issue 1: State the primary legal issue at stake, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.] 2. [Issue 2: Any additional issues that are pertinent to the case.] 3. [Issue 3: If applicable, mention any procedural issues or points of law that the court may need to consider.] **Legal Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Paula Ramsum argues that [detailed explanation of the plaintiff's legal reasoning and evidence]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Walter Frenzel counter-argues that [detailed explanation of the defendant's legal reasoning and evidence]. **Court's Decision:** [Summarize the outcome of the case, including any rulings made by the court, whether it was a verdict for the plaintiff or the defendant, any awards granted, and the rationale behind the decision.] **Conclusion:** The case of Paula Ramsum v. Walter Frenzel highlights important legal principles related to [explore the broader implications of the case, its relevance in the field of law, and any precedents it may set]. The court's ruling provides clarity on [specific legal issues or disputes addressed in the case]. **Next Steps:** [If applicable, mention any forthcoming actions, appeals, or further legal proceedings that may arise from the case.] --- *Note: For specific court details, dates, and a more detailed factual background, additional information is required. Please consult the court records or legal databases for comprehensive insights.*

Paula Ramsum v. Walter Frenzel


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available