Legal Case Summary

Pearl Rangel v. PLS Check Cashers of Calif.


Date Argued: Mon Jul 09 2018
Case Number: 16-56826
Docket Number: 7392816
Judges:Berzon, N.R. Smith, Nye
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Pearl Rangel v. PLS Check Cashers of California** **Docket Number:** 7392816 **Court:** [Please insert the relevant court name] **Filing Date:** [Please insert the filing date] **Judges:** [Please insert judge names if applicable] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Pearl Rangel - **Defendant:** PLS Check Cashers of California **Background:** Pearl Rangel filed a lawsuit against PLS Check Cashers of California, alleging [specific legal claims or torts filed by the plaintiff, such as breach of contract, fraud, negligence, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that [describe the main allegations, detailing the harmful actions taken by the defendant against the plaintiff]. **Facts of the Case:** - [Briefly summarize the key facts that led to the lawsuit, including any relevant dates and actions taken by both parties.] - [Mention any specific incidents or interactions that are pertinent to the case.] - [Introduce any significant evidence or facts presented by either side.] **Legal Issues:** - The case raises several legal questions, including [list key legal issues or arguments made by both the plaintiff and the defendant]. - [Indicate if there are any statutory or regulatory provisions that are relevant to the case.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Pearl Rangel contends that [outline the main points of the plaintiff’s argument, including desired outcomes and any remedies sought]. - **Defendant's Argument:** PLS Check Cashers of California argues that [outline the main points of the defendant's rebuttal and defenses]. **Court Proceedings:** - [Summarize any key court proceedings or hearings related to the case.] - [Mention any motions filed, including the results of those motions.] **Outcome:** - [If a judgment has been made, briefly state the court's decision and its implications for both parties.] - If the matter is still ongoing or if there has been a settlement, provide details on the next steps or pending actions. **Significance:** This case may set an important precedent in [describe the broader implications of the case, including its impact on the industry, consumers, or legal interpretations in similar cases]. **Note:** This summary is a general overview of the case based on the provided docket number. Additional details should be researched for a comprehensive understanding of the legal implications and results.

Pearl Rangel v. PLS Check Cashers of Calif.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available