Case Summary
**Case Summary: Peck v. Cingular Wireless (Docket No. 7852562)**
**Court**: [Specify Court, if known]
**Date**: [Specify date, if known]
**Judges**: [Specify judges, if known]
**Background**:
In the case of Peck v. Cingular Wireless, the plaintiff, Peck, filed a lawsuit against Cingular Wireless, alleging claims related to [briefly specify claims such as breach of contract, consumer protection issues, improper charges, etc.]. The case emerged from issues concerning [summarize the context, e.g., service disputes, billing inaccuracies, contract terms, etc.].
**Facts**:
1. The plaintiff, Peck, entered into a service agreement with Cingular Wireless for mobile phone services.
2. Peck alleged that Cingular Wireless [describe the specific grievances, e.g., failed to provide promised services, charged incorrect fees, etc.].
3. Cingular Wireless contended that [summarize the defense’s arguments, e.g., the charges were justified, the services were provided as per the agreement].
**Legal Issues**:
The primary legal issues in this case centered around [list pertinent legal issues, such as breach of contract, compliance with consumer protection laws, etc.]. The court needed to determine whether Cingular Wireless violated any contractual obligations or legal standards that warranted relief for Peck.
**Decision**:
The court [state the ruling or outcome of the case, e.g., ruled in favor of one party, dismissed the case, required mediation, etc.]. The decision was based on [summarize the court’s reasoning, any legal precedents applied, and implications of the ruling].
**Conclusion**:
Peck v. Cingular Wireless highlights [discuss any broader implications, such as consumer rights, contract enforcement, or corporate accountability]. The case underscores the importance of clear communication and documentation in service agreements, as well as the need for companies to adhere strictly to their contractual commitments.
**Notes**:
- Parties may appeal the decision, which could further interpret relevant laws relating to telecommunications and consumer rights.
- This case serves as a reference point for similar disputes involving service providers and consumers.
**Docket Number**: 7852562
[Continue with any additional relevant information or note specifics regarding appeals, notable quotes from the judgement, or implications for future cases, if necessary.]
(Note: Specific details regarding the court's ruling, judges, and precise dates would need to be filled in, as they were not provided in the original request.)