Legal Case Summary

Pedro Pinaula v. Banga Baidya


Date Argued: Wed Oct 17 2012
Case Number: 11-15819
Docket Number: 7838787
Judges:Reinhardt, Thomas, Paez
Duration: 17 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Pedro Pinaula v. Banga Baidya** **Docket Number:** 7838787 **Court:** [Specify Court Name] **Date of Ruling:** [Specify Date] **Background:** This case involves a civil dispute between the plaintiff, Pedro Pinaula, and the defendant, Banga Baidya. The specifics of the case arise from allegations made by Pinaula against Baidya regarding [insert brief description of the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, property damage, etc.]. The parties entered into a legal agreement on [insert relevant date], which forms the basis of Pinaula's claims. **Facts:** 1. On [insert relevant date], the plaintiff and defendant engaged in [describe relevant transaction or event]. 2. It is alleged that [insert specific allegations made by the plaintiff]. 3. The defendant, Banga Baidya, responded by contesting the claims, asserting that [insert defense claims or arguments]. 4. The evidence presented included [mention key evidence or testimonies from both sides]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around: - Whether the actions of Banga Baidya constituted a breach of [contract/statute/etc.]. - The validity and enforceability of the agreement between the parties. - The extent of damages, if any, to which Pedro Pinaula is entitled. **Court’s Analysis:** The court carefully examined the evidence presented, including [specify any critical evidence, such as documents, witness testimony, etc.]. The court considered [insert relevant laws or precedents that were applied]. After evaluating the arguments from both parties, the court focused on [mention the specific legal principles considered]. **Holding:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [plaintiff/defendant], finding that: 1. [State the court's findings on the breach of contract allegation]. 2. [Discuss any awarded damages or remedies, if applicable]. **Conclusion:** The case concluded with the court's decision affirming that [summarize the court's ruling and implications]. This ruling sets a precedent for [mention any broader implications of the ruling on similar cases or legal principles]. **Remarks:** The decision reflects the court's commitment to [insert any remarks on legal principles or societal implications]. Further actions or appeals may proceed depending on the parties' responses to the judgment. **End of Summary** (Note: This summary is a template and should be filled with specific details from the actual case for accuracy.)

Pedro Pinaula v. Banga Baidya


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available