Legal Case Summary

People ex rel Donnelly v. City of Spring Valley


Date Argued: Wed Dec 05 2018
Case Number: 3-18-0202
Docket Number: 8348276
Judges:Not available
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: People ex rel. Donnelly v. City of Spring Valley** **Docket Number:** 8348276 **Court:** [Specify court, e.g., Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division] **Date:** [Insert relevant date(s) if known] **Overview:** In the case of *People ex rel. Donnelly v. City of Spring Valley*, the relator, Donnelly, sought to address an issue involving the City of Spring Valley. The specifics of the case revolved around [insert the primary legal issue, e.g., violations of local ordinances, governmental abuse of power, etc.]. **Factual Background:** The case stems from actions taken by the City of Spring Valley that allegedly infringed upon the rights or interests of the relator, Donnelly. [Briefly summarize the facts leading up to the case, including any relevant events, actions by the City, and how they affected Donnelly.] **Legal Issues:** The legal questions at the heart of the case included: 1. [First legal issue, e.g., whether the City acted beyond its authority in a specific action.] 2. [Second legal issue, if applicable, e.g., whether proper procedures were followed in administrative decisions.] **Arguments:** - **For the Relator (Donnelly):** The relator argued that the actions taken by the City were illegal [provide additional details on the arguments made by Donnelly and any legal precedents cited]. - **For the City of Spring Valley:** The City defended its actions by [summarize the City’s arguments and legal rationale for its actions]. **Decision:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [state which party the court sided with, if known]. The judgment was based on [summarize the reasoning of the court, including any legal statutes or precedents that were crucial to the decision]. **Conclusion:** The case of *People ex rel. Donnelly v. City of Spring Valley* highlights significant issues concerning [insert broader implications or legal principles illustrated by the case]. The ruling set a precedent regarding [discuss any impact on local governance, administrative law, or public rights]. **Significance:** This case serves as a critical reference for understanding the balance of power between municipal authorities and individual rights, providing insights into how legal frameworks operate in conflicts involving local governance. --- (Note: Ensure to fill in any specific details such as court name, dates, and the actual outcomes as needed. This is a general template based on typical case summaries.)

People ex rel Donnelly v. City of Spring Valley


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available