Legal Case Summary

People v. Little


Date Argued: Thu Dec 04 2014
Case Number: 4-13-1114
Docket Number: 3087485
Judges:Not available
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: People v. Little, Docket Number 3087485** **Court:** [Insert relevant court information] **Date:** [Insert date of decision] **Parties:** People of the State of [Insert State] v. [Defendant's Name] (Little) **Facts:** In the case of People v. Little, the defendant, [Defendant's Name], was charged with [insert specific charges, e.g., theft, assault, etc.]. The charges stemmed from an incident on [insert date of incident], where [briefly describe what occurred, including relevant details about the crime and the defendant's actions]. **Procedural History:** The case was filed in [insert court name] under docket number 3087485. The defendant entered a plea of [insert plea, e.g., not guilty, guilty] on [insert date]. The prosecution's case rested on [summarize the evidence and key testimony presented during the trial]. **Issues:** Key legal issues in this case included: 1. [Issue 1, e.g., the admissibility of certain evidence] 2. [Issue 2, e.g., whether the defendant's rights were violated during arrest] 3. [Issue 3, e.g., whether the prosecution met the burden of proof] **Holding:** The court ultimately ruled on the issues presented by determining [summarize the court's ruling on the key issues]. The verdict delivered was [insert verdict—conviction, acquittal, etc.] on [insert date]. **Conclusion:** The case concluded with [brief summary of the sentence or any repercussions for the defendant]. The ruling outlined crucial legal interpretations related to [insert relevant legal principles, e.g., self-defense, intent, etc.] impacting future cases of a similar nature. **Significance:** People v. Little is significant for [insert why the case is important, e.g., it sets a precedent, clarifies legal standards, highlights issues of rights and justice, etc.]. **Dissenting Opinions:** [If applicable, summarize any dissenting opinions or contending views regarding the outcome of the case.] --- *Note: Specific details such as names, dates, and jurisdiction should be filled in as appropriate based on the actual case documentation.*

People v. Little


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available


no audio transcript available