Legal Case Summary

People v. Perkins


Date Argued: Wed Oct 31 2018
Case Number: 5-16-0182
Docket Number: 8115491
Judges:Not available
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: People v. Perkins (Docket Number: 8115491)** **Court:** [Specify court name if known, e.g., Superior Court of XYZ] **Date:** [Insert date of the ruling, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** The People of the State (Prosecution) - **Defendant:** [Defendant's full name, e.g., John Perkins] **Charge(s):** [Specify the nature of the charges leveled against the defendant, e.g., theft, drug possession, etc.] **Facts of the Case:** The case of People v. Perkins involves the defendant, John Perkins, who was charged with [briefly outline the circumstances of the case, e.g., "possession of illegal narcotics with the intent to distribute."]. The incident leading to these charges occurred on [insert date of incident], when law enforcement officials [describe what happened during the arrest or investigation, e.g., "conducted a search warrant at Perkins’ residence where they discovered a large quantity of illegal substances."]. **Procedural History:** The case was initiated with the filing of charges against Perkins on [insert date]. Throughout the proceedings, the defendant has [specify any pre-trial motions, plea negotiations, or notable trial events, e.g., "moved to suppress evidence obtained during the search, claiming it was unconstitutional."]. **Issues:** - The primary legal issues in this case revolve around [list key legal issues, e.g., "the legality of the search warrant and the admissibility of evidence recovered during the search."]. - Additional considerations included [mention any other relevant legal considerations, such as the defendant's prior criminal history or motivations behind his actions]. **Decision:** On [insert date of decision if known], the court ruled [summarize the court's findings and conclusions, e.g., "in favor of the prosecution, allowing the evidence collected during the search to be admitted at trial."]. **Outcome:** Following the decision, [outline the next steps, e.g., "the case proceeded to trial where a jury convicted Perkins of the charges, leading to a sentencing hearing set for a later date."]. [If applicable, mention any subsequent appeals or motions filed by the defendant.] **Significance:** This case highlights important legal principles relevant to [discuss the broader implications or legal precedents set by the case, e.g., "search and seizure laws and the balance between law enforcement needs and individual privacy rights."]. --- *Note: Specific details may vary based on available case records and jurisdiction. Please customize the summary with accurate information related to the case.*

People v. Perkins


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available


>Courtlister