Legal Case Summary

Percell Dansberry v. Randy Pfister


Date Argued: Fri Jan 23 2015
Case Number: CAAP-14-0000502
Docket Number: 2627579
Judges:Not available
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Percell Dansberry v. Randy Pfister, Docket Number 2627579** **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Percell Dansberry - **Defendant:** Randy Pfister **Background:** Percell Dansberry filed a lawsuit against Randy Pfister under the context of [briefly outline the nature of the claims, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The case revolves around [provide a brief overview of the circumstances that led to the legal dispute, including key facts and events relevant to the case]. **Claims:** The plaintiff asserts that [summarize the key claims made by Dansberry, such as damages sought, specific breaches or actionable items]. Dansberry alleges that [include any pertinent details regarding actions taken by Pfister that led to the claim]. **Defendant's Position:** Randy Pfister denies the allegations and asserts [summarize Pfister's defense, counterclaims, or any affirmative defenses brought forth]. Pfister contends that [briefly explain the basis of Pfister's rebuttal, including any key defenses or alternative narratives regarding the claims]. **Court Proceedings:** Outline the major developments during the court proceedings, including pre-trial motions, evidence presented, and witness testimonies, if applicable. Highlight any significant rulings made by the court that impacted the case. **Outcome:** The final decision made by the court regarding the claims presented by Dansberry and Pfister's defenses. This includes any judgments, settlements, or orders issued by the court, along with any monetary judgments or injunctions. **Significance:** Discuss the implications of the case outcome and its relevance to existing law or future cases. If applicable, analyze any broader societal or legal issues raised by the case. **Conclusion:** Summarize the key points of the case, including the resolution and lasting implications. If the case had significant ramifications, articulate those as part of a concluding thought. **Note:** [Include any potential for appeal or request for further legal proceedings, if relevant.] Please replace placeholders with specific information as per case details or further legal context.

Percell Dansberry v. Randy Pfister


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available