Legal Case Summary

Peters & Freedman v. Centex Homes


Date Argued: Tue Mar 03 2015
Case Number:
Docket Number: 2638874
Judges:Pregerson, Fernandez, Nguyen
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name:

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Peters & Freedman v. Centex Homes** **Docket Number:** 2638874 **Court:** [Specify the court if known] **Date of Decision:** [Insert decision date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiffs:** Peters & Freedman - **Defendant:** Centex Homes **Background:** The case of Peters & Freedman v. Centex Homes involves a dispute between the plaintiffs, Peters & Freedman, and the defendant, Centex Homes, a residential home builder. The plaintiffs allege that Centex Homes failed to adhere to the standards and specifications agreed upon in their contract for the construction of their residential property. **Key Issues:** 1. Breach of Contract: The plaintiffs claim that Centex Homes did not fulfill its contractual obligations, specifically relating to the quality and specifications of construction. 2. Damages: The plaintiffs seek compensation for the alleged breaches, including but not limited to the cost of repairs, diminished property value, and any consequential damages incurred as a result of the breach. **Court Proceedings:** The case was presented in court, where evidence was submitted regarding the contractual agreements between the parties, the specific deficiencies noted in the construction work, and the resulting financial implications for the plaintiffs. Testimonies from experts and witnesses were provided to support the claims of insufficient construction practices and breach of trust. **Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [plaintiffs/defendant], finding [insert key findings of the court here, including whether the court found a contract breach and any awards or compensation ordered]. **Implications:** This case reinforces the legal obligations of home builders regarding contract adherence and the expectations of quality in construction. It also highlights the potential for legal recourse available to homeowners in cases of perceived wrongful practices by contractors. **Conclusion:** In Peters & Freedman v. Centex Homes, the court's decision serves as a precedent in construction law, delineating the responsibilities of builders towards their clients and the legal protections available to homeowners. **Note:** Please verify this summary with legal documents or reliable sources for accuracy, as specific details regarding the court’s findings and the implications of the ruling may vary.

Peters & Freedman v. Centex Homes


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available