Legal Case Summary

Peters v. Winco Foods


Date Argued: Mon Oct 17 2005
Case Number: 03-17404
Docket Number: 7857557
Judges:Reinhardt, Thomas, Restina
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Peters v. WinCo Foods** **Docket Number:** 7857557 **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., "Circuit Court of [State]"] **Date:** [Specify Date of Case if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** [Full Name of Plaintiff, e.g., "John Peters"] - **Defendant:** WinCo Foods **Background:** In the case of Peters v. WinCo Foods, the plaintiff, John Peters, brought a lawsuit against the grocery store chain WinCo Foods alleging [state the nature of the complaint briefly, e.g., "negligence resulting in personal injury"]. The incident in question occurred on [specific date], when Peters [describe what happened during the incident, e.g., "slipped and fell due to a wet floor that had not been marked with a warning sign"]. **Claims:** The plaintiff claims that WinCo Foods failed to maintain a safe environment for its customers, which directly led to his injuries. Peters argues that the store's negligence in [specific actions, e.g., "failing to clean the spill or provide adequate warnings"] constitutes a breach of their duty of care. **Defendant's Response:** WinCo Foods has denied the allegations, contending that they took reasonable precautions to ensure customer safety in accordance with industry standards. The defendant may argue that the plaintiff was [state any defenses raised, e.g., "not paying attention and contributed to his own injuries"]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in this case include: 1. Whether WinCo Foods breached its duty of care to the plaintiff. 2. The extent of responsibility, if any, that the plaintiff bears for the incident. 3. The adequacy of the safety measures implemented by WinCo Foods. **Outcome:** [Include the outcome of the case if known, e.g., "The court found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering," or "The case was dismissed due to lack of evidence."] **Significance:** This case highlights the legal expectations of retail establishments regarding customer safety and the implications of negligence claims in personal injury cases. --- **Note:** Ensure to fill in any specific details such as the dates, court name, and specific claims as applicable to the actual case.

Peters v. Winco Foods


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available