Case Summary
**Case Summary: Philip A. Wharton, et al. v. Carl C. Danberg, et al.**
**Docket Number:** 4485422
**Court:** [Specify Court]
**Date:** [Specify Decision Date]
**Background:**
Philip A. Wharton and others (Plaintiffs) filed a lawsuit against Carl C. Danberg and others (Defendants) regarding a dispute that arose from [provide relevant context, such as a contractual agreement, negligence, property damage, etc.]. The plaintiffs sought relief based on [outline the legal grounds for the claims, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, etc.].
**Facts:**
The case originated from [describe the events leading to the lawsuit, including pertinent dates, actions taken by the parties involved, and any relevant interactions]. The plaintiffs alleged that [summarize key allegations made by Wharton and co-plaintiffs], while the defendants contended that [explain any defenses or counterclaims put forth by Danberg and co-defendants].
**Legal Issues:**
The principal issues before the court included:
1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the defendants breached a contractual obligation].
2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether the plaintiffs suffered damages as a result of the defendants' actions].
3. [Any other relevant legal issues].
**Court’s Decision:**
The court ruled in favor of [indicate which party the court sided with] based on [summarize the reasoning of the court, taking into account the findings of fact and conclusions of law]. The court determined that [highlight key legal findings, interpretations of the law, and how they applied to the facts of the case].
**Outcome:**
As a result of the court's decision, [describe the outcome, whether it involved damages awarded, injunctions issued, or dismissals of claims]. The court's ruling set a precedent for [mention any broader implications of the case, if relevant].
**Conclusion:**
The case of Philip A. Wharton, et al. v. Carl C. Danberg, et al. illustrates [summarize the significance of the case and any lessons learned, as well as its impact on similar cases or areas of law].
---
Note: Specific details such as court names, exact issues, and decisions should be filled in as they pertain to the case. Adjustments may be needed based on the actual facts and legal context of the situation.