Legal Case Summary

Pittman v. State of Oregon


Date Argued: Fri Nov 09 2007
Case Number: 05-35900
Docket Number: 7853548
Judges:Fisher, Berzon, Barzilay
Duration: 12 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

### Case Summary: Pittman v. State of Oregon, Docket Number 7853548 **Court:** Oregon Court of Appeals **Date:** [Insert date of decision if available] **Background:** In the case of Pittman v. State of Oregon (Docket No. 7853548), the appellant, identified as Pittman, challenged a ruling made by a lower court regarding [insert the legal issue, e.g., criminal charges, civil rights violation, etc.]. The circumstances surrounding the case involve [briefly summarize the facts leading to the legal dispute, including key events or actions taken by Pittman and the state]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal questions in this case included: 1. [Insert specific legal questions raised by the appellant] 2. [Insert any additional legal issues relevant to the case] **Arguments:** Pittman argued that [summarize Pittman's key arguments, including any constitutional claims or statutory interpretations], asserting that the state’s actions were in violation of [any applicable laws or rights]. The State of Oregon maintained that [summarize the state's counterarguments and justifications for its actions]. **Court’s Findings:** The Oregon Court of Appeals deliberated on the presented arguments and evidence. The court [insert the decision made by the court, indicate whether the lower court's ruling was upheld, reversed, or remanded]. In its ruling, the court [summarize the court’s reasoning, including any pertinent legal precedents and statutes cited]. **Conclusion:** The case of Pittman v. State of Oregon highlights [briefly summarize the broader implications of the case, such as its impact on legal precedent, interpretation of specific laws, or civil rights]. The decision serves as a significant reference point for similar cases involving [insert any relevant legal principles or issues]. **Dissenting Opinions:** [If applicable, summarize any dissenting opinions expressed by judges in the case, highlighting differing viewpoints or concerns raised.] **Significance:** This case is notable for its exploration of [insert key themes, such as due process, criminal defense, state liability, etc.], contributing to ongoing discussions about the balance between state authority and individual rights within the legal framework of Oregon. --- Please feel free to provide additional details or context so that I can refine this summary further.

Pittman v. State of Oregon


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available