Legal Case Summary

Pommier v. Jungheinrich Lift Truck Corporation & Multiton Mic Corporation


Date Argued: Tue Jan 23 2018
Case Number: 3-17-0116
Docket Number: 6280515
Judges:Not available
Duration: 40 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Pommier v. Jungheinrich Lift Truck Corporation & Multiton Mic Corporation** **Docket Number:** 6280515 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Overview:** Pommier v. Jungheinrich Lift Truck Corporation & Multiton Mic Corporation is a civil case involving product liability and negligence. The plaintiff, Pommier, claims damages against the defendants for injuries sustained due to alleged defects in the material handling equipment manufactured by Jungheinrich and Multiton Mic. **Facts:** Pommier, the plaintiff, was operating a lift truck manufactured by Jungheinrich when he sustained injuries. The plaintiff alleges that the lift truck was defective and unreasonably dangerous for its intended use. In particular, Pommier contends that the design of the lift truck did not meet industry safety standards and that proper safety features were absent, leading to the incident in question. The plaintiff asserts that both Jungheinrich and Multiton Mic, the corporation involved, were responsible for the design and manufacture of the defective equipment. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in this case revolve around: 1. Whether the lift truck was defectively designed or manufactured, making it unreasonably dangerous. 2. Whether the defendants failed to provide adequate warnings or instructions for the safe operation of the lift truck. 3. The extent of liability for both Jungheinrich and Multiton Mic in relation to the alleged defects. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Pommier claims that the defendants breached their duty to provide safe products by not adhering to relevant safety standards. He contends that these breaches directly caused his injuries and seeks compensatory damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. - **Defendants’ Argument:** Jungheinrich and Multiton Mic deny any liability, arguing that the lift truck was properly designed and manufactured in accordance with industry standards. They contend that the plaintiff’s injuries were the result of misuse or improper operation of the vehicle and not due to any defect in the product. **Outcome:** [Summarize the judgment or any settlement reached in the case, if available. Discuss if the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or defendants, and any basis for the decision.] **Implications:** This case highlights important aspects of product liability law, emphasizing the responsibilities of manufacturers to ensure their products are safe for consumer use. The outcome serves as a precedent for future cases involving equipment safety and liability in the industrial sector. **Conclusion:** The case of Pommier v. Jungheinrich Lift Truck Corporation & Multiton Mic Corporation underscores the critical nature of safety in product design and the legal implications for manufacturers when their products lead to injury. The court’s decision will contribute to the ongoing dialogue regarding accountability in product manufacturing and consumer safety. [Note: To ensure accuracy and completeness, please verify the specific details of the case outcomes and legal implications as applicable.]

Pommier v. Jungheinrich Lift Truck Corporation & Multiton Mic Corporation


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available