Legal Case Summary

Prashad v. City of Hartford


Date Argued: Fri Feb 03 2017
Case Number: 16-1289
Docket Number: 4580424
Judges:Not available
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Prashad v. City of Hartford, Docket Number 4580424** **Court:** [Specify the court if available, e.g., Superior Court of Connecticut] **Date:** [Specify the date of the judgment or filing, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** [Name] Prashad - **Defendant:** City of Hartford **Case Background:** This case involves a lawsuit filed by Prashad against the City of Hartford, stemming from events that occurred on [specify date or timeframe]. The specifics of the case relate to [describe the underlying issue, e.g., civil rights violations, personal injury, wrongful termination, etc.]. Prashad alleges that [provide details on the claims made by Prashad, including any specific incidents or actions taken by the City that are in dispute]. **Legal Claims:** Prashad asserts several legal claims against the City of Hartford, including but not limited to: 1. [List the main legal claims, such as negligence, violation of municipal law, discrimination, etc.] 2. [Additional claims if applicable] The plaintiff argues that the actions taken by the City were unlawful and caused [detail the types of damages or losses Prashad is claiming, financially or otherwise]. **Defendant's Response:** The City of Hartford has responded to Prashad’s allegations by [briefly describe the City’s defense strategy, such as denying the claims, asserting a lack of liability, providing counterclaims, etc.]. The City claims that [outline any defenses raised by the City, including statutory defenses, affirmative defenses, or other legal arguments]. **Court Proceedings:** The case was filed on [insert date of filing], and subsequent proceedings have included [mention any notable motions, hearings, or evidence submitted]. As part of the discovery process, both parties exchanged information and evidence relevant to the case. **Outcome:** As of the latest available update, the case [has been settled, is still pending, or has reached a conclusion with a ruling]. If there has been a judgment, summarize the court's findings and any decisions made regarding the relief sought by Prashad and the defendant's liability. **Significance:** This case is significant because [explain the wider implications, such as its impact on public policy, potential for precedent-setting, or relevance to future cases]. The outcome may influence how similar cases are adjudicated in the future, particularly regarding [specific legal principles relevant to the claims made]. **Conclusion:** Prashad v. City of Hartford highlights important issues surrounding [rewrite the main contentious issue or area of law]. As the case continues to unfold or reaches a conclusion, it serves as a critical examination of [summarize the themes or legal issues at stake]. --- Note: To obtain the most accurate details, please check the specific court records or legal databases for information relevant to Docket Number 4580424.

Prashad v. City of Hartford


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available