Legal Case Summary

QIMONDA AG v. ITC


Date Argued: Fri Jan 14 2011
Case Number: H039559
Docket Number: 2603930
Judges:Not available
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Federal Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Qimonda AG v. ITC (Docket No. 2603930)** **Court**: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit **Judges**: [Insert relevant judges here] **Decided**: [Insert date of decision] **Key Facts**: Qimonda AG, a semiconductor company, was involved in a dispute with the International Trade Commission (ITC) regarding the importation and sale of certain products that allegedly infringed Qimonda’s patents. The case centered on semiconductor technologies, particularly focusing on the fabrication processes and the resulting products that Qimonda claimed were covered by its patents. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case revolved around patent infringement claims under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Qimonda contended that the ITC had jurisdiction to investigate its claims regarding unfair methods of competition and infringement of intellectual property rights against the respondents involved in the case. **Procedural History**: Qimonda initiated a complaint with the ITC, alleging that certain foreign manufacturers were importing products that infringed its patents. The ITC then conducted an investigation, which led to an initial determination regarding the validity of Qimonda’s patent claims and whether the accused products infringed those claims. **Finding**: The ITC ultimately determined that there was not sufficient evidence to support Qimonda's claims of patent infringement. The commission's findings were based on an analysis of the patents' validity and a determination of whether the products in question were indeed covered by Qimonda’s patents. **Conclusion**: The Federal Circuit upheld the ITC’s ruling, affirming that Qimonda had failed to meet its burden of proof regarding patent infringement. This case highlights the challenges that patent holders face when asserting their rights in the context of international trade and underscores the thorough investigative processes of the ITC regarding patent disputes. **Significance**: The outcome of Qimonda AG v. ITC reinforces the legal standards that patent holders must meet to prove infringement in international trade contexts. It serves as a critical reference for future patent litigation involving semiconductor technologies and the jurisdictional capabilities of the ITC in enforcing intellectual property rights. --- **Please Note**: The details regarding the judges, dates, and specific outcomes may vary based on actual court documents and should be confirmed for accuracy. This summary serves as a general outline of the case for educational purposes.

QIMONDA AG v. ITC


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available