Legal Case Summary

Ramona Rocheleau v. Microsemi Corp.


Date Argued: Mon Feb 13 2017
Case Number: 15-56029
Docket Number: 4584554
Judges:M. Smith, Owens, Korman
Duration: 21 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Ramona Rocheleau v. Microsemi Corp. (Docket No. 4584554)** **Court:** [Specify Court Name] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Ramona Rocheleau - **Defendant:** Microsemi Corporation **Background:** Ramona Rocheleau filed a lawsuit against Microsemi Corporation, claiming [specific claims, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, workplace harassment, etc.]. The plaintiff alleges that [provide brief details of the allegations, including any relevant dates, events, or actions taken by the parties involved]. **Facts:** 1. Ramona Rocheleau was employed by Microsemi Corporation in [position/title] from [start date] until [termination date]. 2. [Briefly describe events leading up to her claims, including any incidents that occurred at the workplace, communications with management, or significant actions by the employer that the plaintiff contends were inappropriate or illegal]. 3. Rocheleau claims that [provide key points of the plaintiff’s argument, citing any supportive evidence such as emails, witness statements, company policies, etc.]. 4. The defendant, Microsemi Corporation, contends that [provide key points of the defense’s argument, including rationale for actions taken against Rocheleau and evidence presented in their defense]. **Legal Issues:** - The case addresses key legal issues such as [list legal questions or statutes involved, e.g., employment law, anti-discrimination laws, wrongful termination, etc.]. - The determination of whether the actions taken by Microsemi Corporation fall under permissible employer conduct or constitute violation of [specific laws or regulations]. **Outcome:** - [If resolution is available, provide the outcome of the case, including any rulings made by the court, settlements, or other findings.] - [If the case is ongoing or in a preliminary stage, state that and mention any scheduled hearings or motions.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it highlights [discuss any broader implications for employer-employee relations, workplace policies, or legal precedents that may arise from the case]. **Notes:** [Optional: Include any specific observations about the case, such as the judges involved, precedent cases, or potential impacts on similar future cases.] *Please note that specific details such as dates, court names, and factual content may need to be filled in based on further research or clarification of the case.*

Ramona Rocheleau v. Microsemi Corp.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available