Case Summary
**Case Summary: Randich v. Lockport Township Firefighters' Pension Board, Docket Number 3086075**
**Court**: [Name of the Court]
**Date**: [Date of the Decision]
**Overview**: This case involves a dispute between the petitioner, Randich, and the Lockport Township Firefighters' Pension Board regarding pension benefits.
**Background**: Randich, a former firefighter, applied for pension benefits from the Lockport Township Firefighters' Pension Board. The board denied his application based on their interpretation of the eligibility requirements outlined in the pension act.
**Legal Issues**:
1. Whether the board correctly interpreted the eligibility criteria for pension benefits as per the relevant statutory framework.
2. Whether Randich met the necessary requirements and qualifications to be eligible for the pension benefits he sought.
**Arguments**:
- **Petitioner Argument**: Randich argued that he fulfilled all necessary conditions for eligibility under the pension act. He contended that the board's denial was unjustified and inconsistent with statutory provisions.
- **Respondent Argument**: The Lockport Township Firefighters' Pension Board maintained that Randich did not meet specific eligibility criteria, citing regulations that they believed supported their decision to deny benefits.
**Decision**: The court [insert court's ruling, e.g., upheld the decision of the board, reversed the board's decision, or remanded the case for further proceedings]. The ruling was based on [insert key reasons for the court's decision, referencing specific statutory provisions or case law as applicable].
**Implications**: This case sets a precedent regarding the interpretation of pension eligibility requirements for firefighters and emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory definitions. It may influence future applications and decisions made by similar pension boards and their assessments of qualification criteria.
**Conclusion**: The outcome of Randich v. Lockport Township Firefighters' Pension Board reinforces the significance of clear statutory interpretation in pension-related disputes and highlights the judicial system's role in resolving conflicts between public employees and pension boards.
(Note: Actual names of the court, relevant dates, and specific rulings should be inserted where indicated, based on the actual case information.)