Case Summary
**Case Summary: Randle Griffin v. Mary Berghuis**
**Docket Number:** 4441858
**Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Appellant:** Randle Griffin
- **Appellee:** Mary Berghuis, Warden
**Background:**
Randle Griffin (the appellant) filed a suit against Mary Berghuis, the warden (the appellee), following the denial of relief related to his incarceration. Griffin's claims likely revolved around issues such as improper incarceration, violations of his rights, or other grievances pertinent to his prison experience.
**Legal Issues:**
The case involves several legal issues typically associated with habeas corpus petitions or prisoner rights issues, potentially including:
- The constitutionality of Griffin's confinement.
- Allegations of violations of procedural or substantive due process rights.
- Examination of prison conditions or treatment.
- Possible claims based on the violations of state or federal laws.
**Court's Decision:**
The Michigan Court of Appeals ultimately ruled on the appeal, either affirming or reversing the lower court’s decision regarding Griffin’s claims against Berghuis. The details of the court’s findings, opinions, and rationale would be provided, including references to relevant legal precedents, statutory interpretations, and assessments of the claims made by Griffin.
**Outcome:**
The final ruling may have implications for Griffin’s incarceration status, potential remedies for any violations found, or ongoing rights and responsibilities regarding inmates in similar circumstances.
**Significance:**
This case highlights the ongoing legal complexities surrounding prisoners' rights, the discretion of correctional officials, and the judicial system's role in addressing grievances of incarcerated individuals. It contributes to the body of case law that shapes the treatment of inmates within the Michigan correctional system.
(Note: For specifics regarding the ruling and detailed legal principles applied, access to the full court opinion and factual context would be necessary.)