Legal Case Summary

Ray v. Holder


Date Argued: Thu May 12 2011
Case Number: 07-72653
Docket Number: 7845807
Judges:Jones, Fletcher W. , Smith N. R.
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Ray v. Holder** **Docket Number:** 7845807 **Court:** [Court Name, if available] **Date:** [Filing date/year if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Appellant:** [Name of the Appellant, if available] - **Appellee:** Eric Holder, in his capacity as Attorney General of the United States **Background:** The case of Ray v. Holder revolves around an appeal made by the petitioner, Ray, challenging a decision made by the Attorney General concerning [specific issue, e.g., immigration status, firearm possession, civil rights, etc.]. The context of this case stems from [briefly explain the underlying facts of the case, such as any relevant prior actions taken by Ray or regulations or statutes being questioned in the appeal]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal questions in this case included whether: 1. [First legal issue addressed in the case] 2. [Second legal issue, if applicable] 3. [Any other pertinent legal issues] **Lower Court Decision:** The lower court's ruling [summarize the decision made by the lower court]. The court found that [details of the rationale behind the ruling, including any statutes, regulations, or case laws cited]. **Arguments:** - **Appellant's Argument:** The appellant argued that [summarize the key points of Ray’s argument, including any legal precedents or statutes he relied upon]. - **Appellee's Argument:** The appellee contended that [summarize the key points presented by Eric Holder’s defense, including counterarguments regarding the appellant's claims]. **Court's Analysis:** In analyzing the case, the court evaluated [discuss how the court approached the legal questions raised, including reasoning, legal standards applied, and interpretations of relevant laws]. The court also considered [mention any significant facts or evidence presented during the proceedings]. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately decided to [summarize the final ruling of the court, whether it affirmed, reversed, or remanded the previous decision]. The ruling has implications for [discuss the broader impact of this decision on relevant laws, policies, or affected groups]. **Significance:** Ray v. Holder serves as a critical analysis of [explain the significance of the case in broader legal or social contexts, such as implications for civil rights, immigration law, or administrative powers of the Attorney General]. **Note:** For complete and accurate details, consult official court documents and legal databases to review the full text of rulings and opinions related to this case.

Ray v. Holder


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available