Legal Case Summary

Raymond Watison v. Mary Carter


Date Argued: Fri Nov 18 2011
Case Number: 10-16778
Docket Number: 7840080
Judges:Farris, Noonan, Bea
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Raymond Watison v. Mary Carter** **Docket Number:** 7840080 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court, State Court] **Date:** [Specify Date of Judgment] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Raymond Watison - **Defendant:** Mary Carter **Background:** The case involves a civil action filed by Raymond Watison against Mary Carter concerning [briefly explain the nature of the dispute, e.g., personal injury, breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The incident that led to the litigation occurred on [date of incident], which resulted in [describe the outcome or specific events that triggered the lawsuit]. **Claims:** - **Plaintiff's Claims:** Watison alleges that Carter [summarize claims made by the Plaintiff, such as "negligently caused injury," "failed to uphold a contract," etc.]. The plaintiff seeks damages for [state the types of damages sought, e.g., medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, etc.]. - **Defendant's Claims/Defenses:** Carter [summarize any defenses or counterclaims made, such as denying liability, arguing contributory negligence, etc.]. The defendant may have argued [include any relevant points of law or specific defenses]. **Court Findings:** The court [outline any key rulings made by the court, such as findings of fact, legal conclusions, and any evidence that was pivotal in the decision]. The judge determined that [state the key legal principles or precedents that influenced the final judgment]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff/defendant], ordering [describe the judgment, including damages awarded, if any, or the dismissal of claims]. The judge emphasized [mention any important remarks or implications made by the judge during the ruling]. **Post-Judgment/Future Actions:** Following the judgment, [mention any appeals filed, additional motions, or other relevant post-judgment actions taken by either party, if applicable]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [explain why the case matters, whether due to legal precedent, implications for future cases, or its impact on the parties involved]. **Note:** Please check official court records or legal databases for comprehensive details and updates pertaining to this case. --- This is a generalized template; actual details, dates, and legal specifics would need to be filled in based on the real case documents or reports.

Raymond Watison v. Mary Carter


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available