Legal Case Summary

Regina Clark v. Carmax Auto Superstores Calif.


Date Argued: Tue Jan 10 2017
Case Number: 15-55279
Docket Number: 4565544
Judges:Kozinski, Watford, Whaley
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Regina Clark v. CarMax Auto Superstores California** **Docket Number**: 4565544 **Court**: [Specific Court Name] **Filing Date**: [Filing Date] **Parties Involved**: - **Plaintiff**: Regina Clark - **Defendant**: CarMax Auto Superstores California **Background**: Regina Clark, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against CarMax Auto Superstores California, alleging issues related to her vehicle purchase. The plaintiff claimed that the vehicle was misrepresented at the time of sale, leading to significant problems after the purchase. **Claims**: 1. **Misrepresentation**: The plaintiff contended that CarMax failed to disclose critical information about the vehicle's condition. 2. **Breach of Contract**: Clark argued that CarMax breached the sales contract by not providing a vehicle that met the agreed-upon standards. 3. **Consumer Fraud**: The plaintiff asserted that CarMax engaged in deceptive practices in violation of California consumer protection laws. **Arguments**: - **For the Plaintiff**: Clark maintained that the dealership had a responsibility to provide a vehicle that was free from defects and should have fully disclosed all known issues with the car. She presented evidence of the vehicle's condition through repair reports and testimony from automotive experts. - **For the Defendant**: CarMax defended itself by arguing that the vehicle was sold "as-is" and that they provided all necessary disclosures to the plaintiff at the time of sale. The defendant claimed that the plaintiff had the opportunity to inspect the vehicle before purchase and agreed to the terms outlined in the contract. **Outcome**: [This section should include the court's decision, verdict, or any settlement that was reached, including any damages awarded to the plaintiff or penalties imposed on the defendant.] **Significance**: This case highlights issues related to consumer protection, the responsibilities of auto dealerships, and the legal implications of vehicle representations in sales contracts. It may set a precedent for how similar cases are handled regarding disclosure and misrepresentation in the auto sales industry. **Note**: Specific details regarding the court's ruling and any penalties or damages awarded are essential for a complete summary. Ensure to include these in the actual case summary document if available.

Regina Clark v. Carmax Auto Superstores Calif.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available