Legal Case Summary

Richard Baatz v. Columbia Gas Transmission


Date Argued: Wed Jan 13 2016
Case Number: SC18945
Docket Number: 3028728
Judges:Not available
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Richard Baatz v. Columbia Gas Transmission** **Docket Number:** 3028728 **Court:** [Specify Court, if known] **Date Filed:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Richard Baatz - **Defendant:** Columbia Gas Transmission **Background:** This case involves Richard Baatz, the plaintiff, who brought legal action against Columbia Gas Transmission, a leading natural gas company, regarding issues related to [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., property damage, negligence, breach of contract, etc.]. The conflict arose from [provide a concise overview of the facts leading up to the lawsuit, including relevant dates, locations, and the actions of both parties]. **Claim:** Baatz alleges that Columbia Gas Transmission [insert specific claims made by the plaintiff, such as failing to uphold safety regulations, causing damages to property, negligence, etc.]. The plaintiff is seeking [mention any specific remedies sought, such as compensation for damages, injunctive relief, or any other requests]. **Defendant’s Response:** Columbia Gas Transmission has responded to Baatz’s claims by [summarize the defendant's response, which may include denial of allegations, assertion of defenses, and any counterclaims]. The company maintains that [insert any key arguments or defenses presented by Columbia Gas]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several important legal issues, including [list any significant legal principles involved, such as liability under specific statutes, contractual obligations, negligence standards, etc.]. **Current Status:** As of the last update, the case is at [describe the current stage of litigation, such as discovery, pre-trial motions, trial, etc.]. Upcoming proceedings include [outline any scheduled court dates or motions]. **Conclusion:** This case exemplifies the ongoing legal tensions between property owners and utility companies regarding [summarize key themes, such as damage liability, regulatory compliance, or public safety]. The outcome could have implications for similar cases involving natural gas transmission and property rights. **Next Steps:** The court is expected to [detail any anticipated developments, such as rulings on motions, trial schedules, or settlement talks]. (Note: Specific details such as dates, legal arguments, and next steps should be filled in where indicated, based on the actual circumstances surrounding the case.)

Richard Baatz v. Columbia Gas Transmission


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available