Legal Case Summary

Richard Cox v. Leland McEwen


Date Argued: Tue Aug 26 2014
Case Number: W2014-00137-CCA-R3-PC
Docket Number: 2606754
Judges:Gleason, O'SCANNLAIN, RAWLINSON
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Richard Cox v. Leland McEwen** **Docket Number:** 2606754 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Richard Cox - **Defendant:** Leland McEwen **Background:** This case revolves around a dispute between Richard Cox and Leland McEwen. The specifics surrounding the nature of the dispute, whether it be contractual, tortious, or another legal issue, were critical in shaping the arguments presented by both parties. The background details the events leading up to the legal action, including any relevant agreements, incidents, or actions taken by the parties that contributed to the conflict. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case may include claims surrounding liability, breach of contract, damages, and any defenses put forth by McEwen. The court is tasked with determining the validity of the claims made by Cox and whether McEwen’s actions constituted a breach of duty or contractual obligation. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Richard Cox likely argued that he suffered damages due to actions or negligence on the part of Leland McEwen. The plaintiff would need to provide evidence to substantiate his claims, including documentation, witness testimonies, or expert opinions. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Leland McEwen’s defense may have involved disputing the allegations made by Cox, arguing that he fulfilled his obligations or that Cox was partly responsible for the damages claimed. The defense might present counter-evidence and legal precedents to support his position. **Court’s Findings:** The outcome will hinge on the judge's or jury's assessment of the evidence provided, the credibility of the witnesses, and the application of relevant law. The court may examine precedents to reach a decision on the merits of the case. **Ruling:** The ruling will determine whether Richard Cox is entitled to damages and, if so, the amount. It may also address any legal costs and the potential for appeals depending on the ruling's nature. **Conclusion:** The case of Richard Cox v. Leland McEwen stands as an important legal matter that underscores issues related to [specify relevant topics like contract law, tort law, personal injury, etc.]. The judgment will clarify the legal principles applicable to similar disputes and set a precedent for future cases. [Note: Specific details about the case, including the nature of the dispute, the court's decision, and any implications, would need to be inserted based on actual case documentation and the legal context surrounding it, as well as the relevant jurisdiction and facts.]

Richard Cox v. Leland McEwen


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available