Case Summary
**Case Summary: Richard Kollin Jr. v. City of Cleveland**
**Docket Number:** 4442255
**Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, Ohio, if applicable]
**Date:** [Specify the date of the decision or relevant filings]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Richard Kollin Jr.
- **Defendant:** City of Cleveland
**Background:**
Richard Kollin Jr. filed a lawsuit against the City of Cleveland, alleging [briefly summarize the basis of the claim, e.g., personal injury, property damage, civil rights violation, etc.]. The specifics of the case revolve around [describe circumstances, such as an incident involving city employees, alleged negligence, violations of municipal law, etc.].
**Facts:**
1. **Incident Description:** On [insert date], an event occurred involving [describe the incident, such as a vehicle accident, injury on public property, etc.].
2. **Plaintiff’s Claims:** Richard Kollin Jr. claims that the City of Cleveland [insert key allegations, such as failure to maintain safe conditions, improper conduct by city officials, etc.].
3. **Defendant’s Response:** The City of Cleveland has [summarize their defense, indicating whether they deny allegations, claim immunity, or provide alternative explanations].
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues presented in this case include:
1. [Issue 1 - e.g., whether official immunity applies to city officials]
2. [Issue 2 - e.g., whether the city can be held liable for damages under specific civil rights laws]
3. [Any other relevant legal questions]
**Court’s Analysis:**
The court examined the claims based on statutory and case law relevant to [mention the legal principles or standards applied, such as negligence, municipal liability, etc.]. Key considerations included:
- [Relevant legal precedent]
- [Application of law to the facts of the case]
- [Assessment of evidence presented by both parties]
**Conclusion:**
The court rendered a decision on [insert date], resulting in [summarize the outcome, e.g., a ruling in favor of the plaintiff, dismissal of the case, a settlement, etc.]. The ruling has implications for [insert any broader impacts or considerations for future cases involving municipal liability or civil rights].
**Next Steps:**
Following the court’s ruling, [discuss whether there are options for appeal, enforcement of any judgments, or further proceedings required].
**Note:** The above summary provides a general outline and should include specific details and legal citations as applicable based on the actual case documents and outcomes available.
(Note: As of my last update, detailed information on this specific case may not be available. Please verify with legal databases or court records for complete details.)