Legal Case Summary

Richard Sudberry v. State of Arizona


Date Argued: Thu Dec 01 2011
Case Number: 10-17076
Docket Number: 7840057
Judges:Carr, Thomas, Clifton
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Richard Sudberry v. State of Arizona** **Docket Number:** 7840057 **Court:** Arizona Court of Appeals **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Background:** Richard Sudberry was charged with [Specify Charges], after being apprehended under circumstances that raised questions of legality and due process. Sudberry contended that his rights were violated during the arrest and subsequent legal proceedings. The case garnered attention due to claims of improper police conduct and potential violations of constitutional rights. **Issues:** The primary issues in this case centered around: 1. The legality of Sudberry's arrest. 2. The admissibility of evidence obtained during the arrest. 3. Allegations of ineffective legal representation. **Facts:** - Sudberry was arrested on [Insert Date of Arrest], following a [Brief Description of Incident Leading to Arrest]. - He argued that law enforcement lacked probable cause for his arrest, claiming that [Describe Sudberry's Arguments Regarding Arrest]. - Evidence obtained during the arrest included [Specify Evidence], which Sudberry claimed was inadmissible due to [Reason for Inadmissibility]. **Procedural History:** Sudberry’s defense team filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained during the arrest, leading to a series of hearings. The trial court ruled [Insert Ruling], prompting Sudberry to appeal the decision based on claims of procedural errors and constitutional violations. **Judgment:** The Arizona Court of Appeals reviewed the case, focusing on the issues of probable cause, admissibility of evidence, and the effectiveness of Sudberry’s legal counsel. The court ultimately ruled [Insert Court Ruling], affirming or overturning the lower court's decision. **Conclusion:** The case of Richard Sudberry v. State of Arizona highlights important issues related to arrest procedures, evidence admissibility, and the rights of defendants in criminal proceedings. The court's ruling will have implications not only for Sudberry but also for future cases concerning similar constitutional challenges. **Keywords:** Richard Sudberry, State of Arizona, Arrest, Evidence Admissibility, Legal Representation, Constitutional Rights, Court of Appeals. (Note: Please fill in the specific details regarding charges, dates, and rulings to complete this summary accurately.)

Richard Sudberry v. State of Arizona


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available