Case Summary
**Case Summary: Richard W. McCarthy Trust Dated September 2, 2004 v. Illinois Casualty Company**
**Docket Number:** 3086040
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Circuit Court or Appellate Court]
**Filing Date:** [Provide the filing date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Richard W. McCarthy Trust Dated September 2, 2004
- **Defendant:** Illinois Casualty Company
**Background:**
This case involves the Richard W. McCarthy Trust, established in 2004, which brought action against Illinois Casualty Company. The central issue revolves around an insurance dispute that arose following an incident that the trust contended should have been covered under its policy with the defendant.
**Facts:**
- The Richard W. McCarthy Trust alleges that it entered into an insurance policy with Illinois Casualty Company that provided coverage for certain risks.
- The Trust contended that it suffered a loss or damage that fell within the scope of the coverage.
- Following the incident, the Trust filed a claim with Illinois Casualty Company for the loss.
- Illinois Casualty Company allegedly denied the claim, leading to the dispute.
**Legal Issues:**
- The primary legal question centers on whether the insurance policy issued by Illinois Casualty Company covered the specific incident claimed by the Trust.
- Additionally, issues of bad faith and failure to provide coverage may be examined, depending on the circumstances surrounding the denial of the claim.
**Procedural History:**
- The Trust initiated legal proceedings against Illinois Casualty Company, seeking recovery for the claimed losses.
- The case may have involved motions for summary judgment, discovery disputes, and other pre-trial proceedings typical in insurance litigation.
**Outcome:**
- The case may have reached a settlement, trial, or a ruling by the court, determining the obligations of Illinois Casualty Company under the policy in question.
- [Insert any specific rulings, damages awarded, or dismissals that were made in the case.]
**Significance:**
- This case underscores the complexities involved in insurance disputes, particularly regarding coverage interpretation and the roles of both insurers and insured parties.
- The outcome may provide insights into how courts interpret insurance contracts, especially in cases involving trusts and similar entities.
**Note:** Further details on the ruling or settlement may be necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the case's implications and its impact on future insurance claims and coverage interpretation.