Case Summary
**Case Summary: Robert Englehardt v. Carolyn W. Colvin**
**Docket Number:** 7836288
**Court:** [Insert relevant court here, e.g., United States District Court]
**Date:** [Insert relevant date here]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Robert Englehardt
- **Defendant:** Carolyn W. Colvin (Acting Commissioner of Social Security)
**Background:**
Robert Englehardt filed a claim against Carolyn W. Colvin, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, challenging the denial of his application for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. Englehardt asserted that he was disabled due to [insert relevant medical conditions or reasons for disability claim], which impeded his ability to work.
**Procedural History:**
Englehardt's claim for SSDI benefits was initially denied by the Social Security Administration (SSA). Following the denial, he sought reconsideration, which also resulted in a denial. Subsequently, he requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ ruled against him, leading Englehardt to file an appeal in federal court.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards in evaluating Englehardt's claims of disability.
2. Whether the ALJ's decision was supported by substantial evidence in the record.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Englehardt):** Argued that the ALJ failed to properly consider the medical evidence, including [insert any specific medical reports or evaluations], and did not fully evaluate the impact of his disabilities on his daily life and ability to work. Englehardt contended that the ALJ erred in discounting the credibility of his testimony and medical reports.
- **Defendant (Colvin):** Maintained that the ALJ's decision was comprehensive and based on substantial evidence. Colvin argued that the ALJ appropriately assessed Englehardt's residual functional capacity (RFC) and that the decision should be upheld.
**Court's Decision:**
[Insert the outcome of the case: whether the court upheld the ALJ's decision, remanded the case, or reversed the decision.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Robert Englehardt v. Carolyn W. Colvin addresses important issues concerning the evaluation of disability claims and the standards applied by the Social Security Administration. The ruling [insert outcome] serves as a significant reference for future cases involving SSDI claims and the treatment of medical evidence in administrative hearings.
**Note:** For complete details of the case, including legal opinions and specific findings, refer to the official court records or legal databases.