Legal Case Summary

Robert Frank v. City of Henderson


Date Argued: Wed Feb 14 2018
Case Number: 16-16531
Docket Number: 6305232
Judges:Bea, N.R. Smith, Lasnik
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Robert Frank v. City of Henderson** **Docket Number:** 6305232 **Court:** [Specify Court, if known] **Date:** [Specify Date, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Appellant/Plaintiff:** Robert Frank - **Appellee/Defendant:** City of Henderson **Facts of the Case:** Robert Frank filed a lawsuit against the City of Henderson alleging [insert specific claims made by Robert Frank, such as violation of civil rights, improper action by city officials, personal injury, etc.]. The case arose from incidents that occurred on [insert date or timeframe], during which Frank contends that [briefly outline the key events leading to the lawsuit]. **Claims:** Frank's claims against the City of Henderson included [list the legal claims, e.g., negligence, breach of duty, civil rights violations, etc.]. He sought [insert what the plaintiff sought—damages, injunctive relief, etc.]. **Procedural History:** The case was filed in [insert court name and jurisdiction]. Following the initial filing, the City of Henderson responded to the complaint with [mention any motions filed, such as a motion to dismiss or summary judgment]. The court conducted [describe any hearings, trials, or mediations that occurred] before issuing its ruling. **Issues:** The key legal issues in this case included: 1. Whether the City of Henderson can be held liable for the actions/decisions made regarding [specific actions being challenged]. 2. The interpretation of [any relevant statutes, municipal codes, or constitutional provisions applicable to the case]. **Court's Holding:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [insert which party the court ruled for], holding that [summarize the court's reasoning and the outcome]. [Discuss any legal precedents or statutes the court relied upon in its decision.] **Conclusion:** In conclusion, the case of Robert Frank v. City of Henderson presents important questions regarding [reference the broader implications of the case, such as municipal liability, individual rights, etc.]. The ruling may impact future cases involving similar issues [add potential precedents or legal principles established]. **Note:** Further details regarding the judgment, including any appellate actions or what the decision means for the involved parties and the broader community, can be elaborated upon depending on subsequent developments in the case.

Robert Frank v. City of Henderson


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available