Case Summary
**Case Summary: Robert Sigillito v. Jerry Hollander, Jr.**
**Docket Number: 3059153**
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Robert Sigillito
- **Defendant:** Jerry Hollander, Jr.
**Background:**
The case involves a legal dispute between Robert Sigillito and Jerry Hollander, Jr. The specifics surrounding the nature of the dispute have not been explicitly detailed, but it typically involves issues of contract, property, or personal injury.
**Facts:**
1. Robert Sigillito initiated legal action against Jerry Hollander, Jr., alleging grievances that may involve contractual obligations or tortious actions.
2. The plaintiff claims damages or relief based on the actions of the defendant.
3. Evidence presented may include witness testimony, documentation, and expert opinions.
**Legal Issues:**
The case raises several legal questions that may include:
- Breach of contract or fiduciary duty
- Negligence or liability
- Interpretation of relevant statutes or case law
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Sigillito):** Argues for compensation or specific performance based on claims against Hollander. He may present evidence demonstrating harm or financial loss as a result of Hollander's actions.
- **Defendant (Hollander):** Likely presents a defense denying allegations or providing justifications for his actions. This could involve disputing the facts presented by Sigillito or asserting that he acted within legal boundaries.
**Outcome:**
The resolution of the case could involve a ruling in favor of either party, potentially awarding damages or mandating specific actions. The judgment may also include provisions for appeals or further legal remedies.
**Conclusion:**
This summary reflects a brief overview of the case Robert Sigillito v. Jerry Hollander, Jr., with docket number 3059153. For detailed insights, including rulings or implications of the case, consult the court's official records.
(Note: Specific details regarding the court, legal arguments, and outcomes would depend on further information from court documents, as they may vary significantly by jurisdiction and case particulars.)