Case Summary
**Case Summary: Robert Stevens v. CoreLogic, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 6218872
**Court:** [Specify Court, if known]
**Date:** [Specify Date, if known]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Robert Stevens
- **Defendant:** CoreLogic, Inc.
**Background:**
Robert Stevens initiated a legal action against CoreLogic, Inc., a data and analytics company, over concerns regarding the accuracy and handling of his personal information. CoreLogic, which provides various data services including credit reporting and risk assessment, was accused by Stevens of misreporting data which adversely affected his credit score.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Data Accuracy:** Stevens alleged that CoreLogic failed to ensure the accuracy of the information it reported, violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
2. **Injury and Damages:** Stevens sought to demonstrate that he suffered financial and reputational harm as a result of the inaccurate reporting.
3. **Reporting Obligations:** The case examined CoreLogic's compliance with industry standards and statutory requirements regarding the accuracy and integrity of consumer data.
**Legal Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Stevens contended that the misinformation provided by CoreLogic led to significant inconveniences and financial damage, and that the company did not take adequate steps to rectify the inaccuracies after they were reported.
- **Defendant's Argument:** CoreLogic defended itself by asserting adherence to the FCRA guidelines and claimed that all reported data was accurate based on the information available at the time of reporting.
**Outcome:**
The case's resolution included determinations on the credibility of evidence regarding data accuracy, the company's compliance with federal regulations, and the extent of damages resulting from the alleged inaccuracies. [Include final judgment or settlement details if available.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights the ongoing challenges consumers face with credit reporting agencies and underscores the importance of accurate data reporting in the financial services industry. It serves as a reminder of the legal protections provided under the FCRA and the responsibilities of data furnishers.
**Conclusion:**
Robert Stevens v. CoreLogic, Inc. underscores critical issues surrounding consumer rights, data accuracy, and the legal frameworks that govern credit reporting practices. The case contributed to the broader dialogue on accountability in data management and consumer protection laws.
[Note: For more specific details, including dates of hearings, motions filed, and other procedural aspects, consult court records or legal databases.]