Legal Case Summary

Robin Farris v. Dave Seabrook


Date Argued: Wed Nov 16 2011
Case Number: 11-35620
Docket Number: 7840116
Judges:Fisher, Paez, Clifton
Duration: 48 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Robin Farris v. Dave Seabrook** **Docket Number: 7840116** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name] **Date of Decision:** [Insert Decision Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Robin Farris - **Defendant:** Dave Seabrook **Background:** Robin Farris filed a lawsuit against Dave Seabrook, alleging [insert specific claims, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, personal injury, etc.]. The dispute arose from events that occurred on [insert relevant date or time frame], where it is claimed that [provide a brief description of the events leading to the lawsuit]. **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues in this case revolve around [list key legal issues, e.g., the interpretation of a contract, the applicability of a law, the standard of care, etc.]. The plaintiff contended that [summarize the plaintiff's argument], while the defendant countered with [summarize the defendant's argument]. **Court Findings:** After reviewing the evidence presented, which included [mention types of evidence, such as witness testimonies, documents, expert opinions, etc.], the court found that [insert the court’s determination regarding the claims]. The court considered [mention any crucial factors or precedents] in reaching its conclusion. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [state whether it was in favor of the plaintiff or defendant]. As a result, [briefly describe the outcome—e.g., awarded damages to the plaintiff, dismissed the case, issued an injunction, etc.]. The court also [mention any special findings, such as awarding costs, ordering specific actions, etc.]. **Conclusion:** The case of Robin Farris v. Dave Seabrook highlights [briefly summarize the significance of the case, any implications for future cases, or its relevance to broader legal principles]. The decision reflects the court's stance on [mention any key legal principles established or reinforced by the case]. **Note:** For detailed references to legal statutes or case law, further inquiry into the specifics of the case, including full text opinions, may be necessary.

Robin Farris v. Dave Seabrook


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available