Legal Case Summary

Robol Law Office v. Recovery Limited Partnership


Date Argued: Wed May 13 2015
Case Number:
Docket Number: 2656922
Judges:Paul V. Niemeyer, Allyson K. Duncan, Stephanie D. Thacker
Duration: 43 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Robol Law Office v. Recovery Limited Partnership** **Docket Number:** 2656922 **Court:** [Specify the Court] **Date:** [Specify the Date of the Decision] **Background:** Robol Law Office filed a lawsuit against Recovery Limited Partnership seeking [specify the nature of the claims, e.g., unpaid fees, breach of contract, etc.]. The case revolves around the contractual obligations between the parties and involves issues such as [include relevant legal issues, e.g., payment, retention of services, legal services rendered, etc.]. **Facts:** - Robol Law Office was retained by Recovery Limited Partnership for [describe the services provided or the nature of the legal representation]. - A contract was established outlining the terms of engagement, including compensation and deliverables. - Following the provision of services, Robol Law Office alleged that Recovery Limited Partnership failed to fulfill its payment obligations as specified in the contract. - Recovery Limited Partnership contended [briefly outline the defense or reasons for the non-payment, if provided]. **Legal Issues:** 1. Whether Robol Law Office had the right to recover fees for services rendered under the terms of the engagement contract. 2. Whether Recovery Limited Partnership had valid defenses against the claim, such as [list any potential defenses, e.g., inadequate performance, lack of communication, etc.]. **Ruling:** [Summarize the court's decision, including any rulings on motions, findings of fact, and conclusions of law. Specify if the court ruled in favor of Robol Law Office or Recovery Limited Partnership, and summarize the reasoning behind the decision.] **Outcome:** The court ruled [state the outcome, e.g., in favor of Robol Law Office for the amount due], emphasizing [highlight any critical aspects of the ruling, such as the enforcement of contractual obligations, implications for future contracts, etc.]. **Implications:** This case illustrates the importance of clear contractual terms between parties and the potential consequences of failing to uphold payment obligations. It may also set precedents regarding [mention any potential legal precedents or interpretations]. --- **Note:** Please replace placeholders with specific details from the case, as the docket or the specifics of the ruling may not be publicly available or may require further research.

Robol Law Office v. Recovery Limited Partnership


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available